It's interesting how much Weber focuses on religion. He doesn't simply take religion on its own terms, as in what it means to the people who founded as well as follow it. No, to Weber, religion creates broad social values and can be key in the creation of social institutions completely unrelated to its own goals.
However logical Weber's argument appears, he relies a lot on anecdotes and case studies to give sense for what these terms mean. His discussion of the spirit of capitalism relies heavily on the writings of Ben Franklin. I think this proves to be the weakest part of Weber's writings. His examples give a good grounding to his definitions; however, because they are simply examples, they can be criticized as not representative of the larger ethos. The lack of quantitative information questions his writing.
No comments:
Post a Comment