Throughout history, series of revolutions had formed the bourgeois and these revolutions widened the gap between these social classes even more. The role of the proletariat is that of a machine, at the mercy of its bourgeois operator. They are no different than the factories they work in; the class is just another mean of production. The proletariat people do not even have an identity because their ideals trickled down from the bourgeois society that was in control. The bourgeoisie does not think of their counterparts as human, as Marx explains, to them they exist only for the purpose of exploitation. Without the proletariat, the bourgeoisie would not survive.
Marx was under the opinion that since the market was expanding throughout the globe, it is only a matter of time before over-production occurs. It is at this time that continued production would no longer be beneficial to the upper class. To him, the bourgeoisie is no longer compatible with society. He thought it necessary for the proletariat to overthrow the bourgeois. This would happen if private property no longer existed. The bourgeoisie could not use their property of factories, land, and laborers to create capital.
I thought reading the Communist Manifesto was interesting because it remains such an important piece literature. It made me think of the predominance of class struggles even in today's society. I also thought Marx's portrayal of society was interesting in terms of how dark it is. To him, the world is simply a place of exploitation with all of the power in the hands of few. It is depressing to think of historical changes in terms of conflict and that advancement is derived from these struggles.
It was not clear to me exactly what Marx meant when he wrote the world will become over-produced. The Communist Manifesto was written over 150 years ago and production is still growing at a rapid pace. Society is becoming more wasteful and materialistic; even the most useless and unnecessary products sell. This production is exploiting the poor to an even greater degree than in Marx's time. In many third world countries many people survive on less than a dollar a day, increasing the gap between the classes. I do not understand what made him think that overproduction would occur within the near future.
Overproduction is an interesting notion in regards to Marx. One could argue that the over indulgence and excess signifies overproduction and it's capital distribution that's the issue. What's really fascinating is the notion of exchange value (section 3 of CAPITAL) and commodity fetishism (section 4 of CAPITAL).
ReplyDeleteGood points, both of you.
ReplyDeleteI would consider the CM's "over-production" in the context of waste (inefficient distribution of resources - consider that about half of the food in US is wasted, yet elsewhere in the world people starve), and in the context of "overchoice" (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overchoice)
I agree i think that over production and Marx's ideas about it are very interesting. The fact that our production rates go up all the time seem to validate his point. The fact that we are creating products that are so unnecessary and exploiting the people who need their money most is just evidence that the production will increase no matter what. I too find the food issue interesting and i think even in our own country its an issue since there are many homeless and starving people in the U.S.. This just adds to the gap between classes.
ReplyDelete