Class struggle will always be a prominent issue in society. The lines may appear to have blurred but in reality social lines dictate to us who is powerful and who works for the powerful. Although our society is constantly changing and progressing, in areas such as technology and science, people will always encounter class struggles. The struggles have and always will evolve over time, dictating to the public who is powerful and who will be controlled by the powerful. As society constantly changes and progresses the need for wealth and power has intensified. This intense need for power within society has caused individuals to be more self-interested actors who will do almost anything to increase their status in society. Marx identifies this class as the bourgeoisie and describes how their transformation over time has changed in accordance to the progression of society. They have lost all traditional values once instilled upon them and operate in a manner that allows them to exercise the most power over others. Their power comes from suppressing the less powerful in society and is used as a means of production. Marx describes the modern society to be just as it was in the past; the world is the way it is because of what happened in the past. There is a divide between two main groups of people; the powerful landowners who have obtained resources to fuel progress and stimulate growth, who hire others to complete the work, and the individuals who work for these people and can only offer their labor in exchange for pay.
Marx argues that the laborers contributions are merely for means of production with no ending goal, and that their existence is limited to long hours of labor with no free time to exercise their creative abilities. Much like a slave the laborer works in order to survive and help the capitalist business grow. Society’s constant urge for expansion causes individuals to lose any hope of working for someone other than the bourgeoisie, who ultimately run society. According to Marx they are “a class of laborers, who live only so long as they find work, and who find work only so long as their labor increases capital.” Marx uses structural estrangement to show that even though society is constantly progressing and changing laborers still become so far removed from the ending product they have no way of knowing if their skills and abilities are worth anything more. The execution of the modern state is but a committee for managing the common affairs of the whole bourgeoisie.
While Marx addresses the bourgeoisie and lower classes relationship in accordance with each other, he fails to go into detail about the middle class and their relationship with the bourgeoisie. There is little mention as to how the middle class either benefits or suffers from the ever expanding and industrializing economy. There is also no suggestion as to how the middle class could possibly help the lower class overcome ruling from the bourgeoisie, which I feel could be helpful when addressing the concerns of the lower class and how they could possibly rise up from domination. The middle class is the backbone in most societies and without their contributions the lower class will always be ruled and dominated in extreme ways. I would be interested to see how Marx feels about the United States current economic situation and how the middle class will fair in the long run.
Note to self: accepting as on time (previously posted as a comment).
ReplyDeleteFor the future assignments, please keep in mind that the deadline for the Tue main blog is 6.00 pm. (This is needed so others have a chance to read and comment on your blog)
ReplyDelete