Marx’s Estranged Labor claims that society is divided into “property owners and propertyless workers”. He addresses the concept of a political economy which perpetuates greed and exploitation of wage laborers. He describes labor as an “alien” concept to the worker, in which man is coerced to work and does not know himself while he works. Division of Labor and Manufacture further reinforces the notion that laborers are slaves to capital, forced to work in order to survive but are only further oppressed by working. The Secret of Primitive Accumulation returns to the concept of political economy as a construct where the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. He introduces the idea of “primitive accumulation” which divides the laborer and the means produced. Finally, in Classes, Marx presents the three main classes of a capitalist society: wage laborers, capitalists, and land owners. Their relationship is defined by wage laborers transformation of the means of production into capital.
I found Marx’s comparison of man, labor and nature in Estranged Labor to be unusual. I found it dramatic that he claimed man is only truly free when performing animal functions (such as eating, drinking etc.). Marx claims that labor is unnatural and forced for man, but I view work as a natural part of life. We must work to provide life essentials, such as food, for ourselves. Perhaps Marx is saying that only labor that is exploited by the bourgeois upon the proletariats is unnatural and forced.
Furthermore, I found Marx’s presentation of landowners as a distinct class in Classes to be surprising. From our previous readings of Marx, I gathered that he believed society to be strictly divided into capitalists and exploited workers. I would be interested in learning more about the role of land owners in Marx’s view of society.
I agree this part of the reading did sound contradictory of what we read earlier and what we went over in class. The way I took Marx "landowners" distinct class was to be kind of a sub-class of the bourgeois. If you own the land you own the means of production. By owning this land, you are above those that are working it (the exploited workers). But I may just be viewing this through capitalist eyes....
ReplyDeleteI felt a bit insulted when reading that Marx only felt that man is free when performing animal functions, as I used to thoroughly enjoy and feel free when doing volunteer work when I was a Boy Scout, and the work I was doing wasn't for my personal benefit, but for the benefit of others, and it feels good to give of oneself to help add to the community, regardless of the status of those helped within the community. Many other high status individuals also donate funds and services to those in need, spreading their wealth to others and expecting no more than a "thank you" in exchange. Marx seems to ignore that human kindness and generosity exist within all classes.
ReplyDeleteAs a society, we have changed from hunters and gathers to those that work for the money to supply needs for our families. It is part of the evolution of human kind. We still feel the need to provide for our families, we just do so in other ways. This topic was interesting to me, but when doing my blog I didn't really think about it. This observation is definitely worth discussing. I think its our nature to do those things, but the way we ensure it has changed.
ReplyDelete