Durkheim and the Division of Labor

            The division of labor is the subdivision and specialization into work and or the task at hand. Durkheim describes solidarity as the bond that holds groups together and the foundation of the division of labor. Durkheim feels that abnormal forms of division of labor could be avoided if laws promoted equality and justice, of the regulatory system functions are monitored, securing a true division of labor and with the elimination of unfair contracts. The division of labor is still prominent in present day society and will continue as long as there is a distinction between the classes. The way our society functions, stronger groups depend on the weaker groups in order to stay in power.  Durkheim’s ideas on the division of labor are based off of the notion that there are two types of social solidarity, mechanical and organic.  These groups work in accordance to their societal commitments and function based on their relation with their community as a whole.      

        The division of labor can be described as a double bind in progressing society. The double bind in modern day work place threatens the internal human spirit by the ever growing capitalist society. As the modern culture emerged so did a constant threat to humanity. The most important functions of society’s daily lives are now dependent on the individuals who are specifically trained technically and commercially to operate daily functions.  Durkheim uses collective conscience to describe different group’s values and norms and how they are interconnected spaces of power and knowledge, which leads to surveillance punishment and control.  The divide in the groups will determine the types of goals and interests they pursue. Their knowledge from which they gained in their daily work process is influenced and controlled by social, economic and political forces. Where an individual is placed and viewed in society will ultimately dictate to them how they view society and the workplace as a whole. It would be interesting to see how Durkheim would approach the division of labor in our present technologically advanced society. Now, more than ever people have access to information and are able to choose the path in which they would like to follow. Durkheim’s ideas on the division of labor may change slightly with the notion that people will act in accordance to their own free will. 

B. Fowler